Topic :Smoking on college campuses, I’m looking for high school leve of writing. Here is the…

Topic :Smoking on college campuses, I’m looking for high school leve of writing. Here is the…

Topic :Smoking on college campuses, I’m looking for high school leve of writing.Here is the all detailes that needed for this essay and it should be 4 full pages.Objective: Conduct secondary research on your proposed research question, representing a variety of sourcetypes and perspectives in your research. Formally document your secondary research sources and evaluateeach in a written annotation. Medium: Bibliographic list of sources, each entry followed by an annotation of summary and evaluation usingsize 12 point Times New Roman or similar font.AnAnnotated Bibliography is a collection of secondary research relevant to shape an argument on yourproposed research question, with notes summarizing, evaluating, and reflecting on each source. Theannotated bibliography is meant to be a useful tool as you gather information and navigate the perspectivesof others on your research topic. And you should treat it as such—noting and exploring those ideas withineach source that you find most useful.For this assignment, you will read and compose bibliographic entries and annotations for a total of four (4) credible sources. These should besources relevant to your research andshould include not only information but also multiple perspectives andopinions related to your research question. You should not be researching only those perspectives with whichyou agree; you should instead be considering alternate or even contradictory perspectives as well. If yourargument cannot be challenged by research, then it is not much of an argument.

Your four sources should focus on building a scholarly base for your research and shouldbe comprised mostly of academic research articles derived from one of the Ivy Tech CommunityCollege online library databases.Please avoid using sources from encyclopedic (like Wikipedia) or reference resources,CQ Researcher, and Opposing Viewpoints in Context databases.Utilize Ivy Tech Library Guides to aidyou in your search.

The final draft of the Annotated Bibliography should focus on filling gaps inyour research and discovering additional evidence to prove your arguments. Consider what additionalperspectives, information, and evidence your need to fully develop your thesis statement and thearguments you make in the Argument Essay. What else do you still need to know? What more do youneed to convince your readers? These sources may comefrom the databases available through the Ivy Tech Library website or from the open web, so long asthey are credible. Some useful genres to look for here might include films; TedTalks; newspaper ormagazine articles; public polling data from polling organizations like Pew Research, fiction/poetry/songlyrics; editorial cartoons; academic journal articles; book chapters; essays; government, advocacy, orresearch institution websites; court rulings; or speeches.Writing Annotations
Each annotated bibliography entry should be a page to a page and a half long. Each annotated bibliography should include the following:1.An MLA style source citation which offers information about
the author, title, publication, date, and location of the source.
2.A summary of the argument/information in the source.3.Evaluation of the credibility of the source, taking into account its evidence and other factors such ashow current the source is or any bias expressed in the source. Here you should also include a few sentences about the sources’ potential usefulness to your research.Organizing your Annotated Bibliographies
The first sentence of your annotation should include the author’s main argument (thesis),statement of purpose and intended audience. Do not include your own opinion or reactions to the sourcehere,but do be sure to use your own words. Use 3rd person point of view and, in most cases, present verbtense. Quote the author very sparingly, if at all. Cut any unnecessary words or details. Include transitionphrases and attributive tags where relevant, and avoid short choppy sentences. Proofread carefully forgrammar and style. Use first person point of view for the evaluative part of the annotation where you address how and why this source is acceptable for an academic paper.Annotated Bibliography Specifics

The Annotated Bibliography rough draft will be based on the sources you will use for your first argumentative paper. You must use at least five sources and all must be scholarly. That means you may not use sources from random websites or Wikipedia. Your sources must also be approved by me in advance during class on Wednesday, June 7.

In four to five double-spaced pages, you are now being asked to formally evaluate your required sources for your next project—the Argumentative Research project. The Amplified Annotated Bibliography project should be comprised of an introduction, citations (with summary and evaluation within the paragraphs), and a conclusion. You may use the first person for the evaluative part of the annotation.

The expectations for each of these section-types are listed below.

  • Introduction should include a general overview and the intended approach to the argumentative project. A research question and working thesis should be a part of this introduction as well.
  • Bibliographical citations should include all of the necessary information for the source and should be in the correct MLA format. The following citation models should be used:
  • Summary/Evaluation paragraphs should follow the appropriate citation and should give a strong summary of the content of the source, along with a careful evaluation of the source. The evaluation of the source should be based on aspects of the source itself and on its relevance for your project. Please see the textbox on the next page for more details. Be sure to answer questions about why you are using the source for the second part of your annotation. You must evaluate the source, not merely describe it.
  • Conclusion should include a discussion of your perceptions about the strength of your sources and the support that they will provide for your argument. You should also recognize any additional needs for your project. Do you need to complete more research? Do you need to change your approach to your argument at all?
  • At least one source from each of the following four categories must be used: 1)scholarly, peer-reviewed article; 2) book with scholarly relevance; 3) a recent news article about your topic from a reputable news organization such as The New York Times, USA Today, The Journal-Gazette,CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, etc. 4) primary research with YOU as the researcher (ie. personal interview, survey, or questionnaire). Sources should not be published before 2010.
  • Use the CARS worksheet and the textbox below to help you evaluate your sources. For instance, address the ethos of the author of the article. What is their position or professional affiliation? What type of articles does the writer usually publish (do a google search on the author to answer this question)? Is the article biased or just informational? Other questions you might ask are as follows:

Aspects of the source

*What do you know about the author? What are his or her credentials? Do others in the field respect this author and reference him or her in their work?

*When was this information published? Is the data current, or does the information come from past studies?

*What do you know about the publisher? What other types of works does this publisher publish? Is this publisher well-respected?

*How consistent are the facts in the article? Do other articles present similar data?

Relevance for your project

*Benefits—How will this source help to support your argument? What is the specific function of the information from this source for your project? Why did you choose this source over other options that you might have had?

*Limitations—Is this source at all biased? Is the information good, but perhaps dated? Does the author take a completely different approach than others in his or her field? Is the information related to your argument but more loosely than you would like for it to be?

Grading Criteria

A strong project will . . .

  • Provide a full evaluation of the required sources and their relevance for your project
  • Demonstrate careful consideration of the project-as-a-whole (self-assessment)
  • Include accurate citations and correct MLA format throughout

Topic :Smoking on college campuses, I’m looking for high school leve of writing. Here is the…