Top of Form Apply Rubrics 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory…

Top of Form Apply Rubrics 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory…

Top of Form

Apply Rubrics

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good


87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 %Psychopathy and Pathophysiology Explained

Explanation of psychopathy and pathophysiology is not present.

Psychopathy and pathophysiology are partially present, but ambiguous and lacking in basic detail.

Psychopathy and pathophysiology are described in general terms. Description is somewhat vague and is left up to interpretation of the reader.

Psychopathy and pathophysiology are described in general terms. Description is correct, but too brief.

Psychopathy and pathophysiology are explained clearly.

15.0 %Relationship to Behavioral Assessment, Intervention, and Implantation to an Organization Setting

Review of the relationship to behavioral assessment, intervention, and implantation to an organizational setting is not present.

Review of the relationship to behavioral assessment, intervention, and implantation to an organizational setting is present, but incomplete.

Review of the relationship to behavioral assessment, intervention, and implantation to an organizational setting is present, but done at a perfunctory level.

Review of the relationship to behavioral assessment, intervention, and implantation to an organizational setting is clearly presented. Research is from original sources, but some are outdated.

Review of the relationship to behavioral assessment, intervention, and implantation to an organizational setting is clearly presented and perceptive. Research is from scholarly, current sources.

15.0 %Discussion of Concepts Helping a Clinical Supervisor (Leader)

Discussion of concepts helping a clinical supervisor (leader) is not present.

Discussion of concepts helping a clinical supervisor (leader) is present, but is ambiguous and lacking in basic detail.

Discussion of concepts helping a clinical supervisor (leader) is described in general terms. Discussion is somewhat vague and is left up to interpretation of the reader.

Discussion of concepts helping a clinical supervisor (leader) is convincing. Discussion is convincing, but not thorough.

Discussion of concepts helping a clinical supervisor (leader) is clearly presented and perceptive. Discussion is perceptive and detailed.

15.0 %Analysis in Individual and Group Settings

Analysis within both individual and group settings is not present.

Analysis within both individual and group settings is present, but is ambiguous and lacking in basic detail.

Analysis within both individual and group settings is done at a superficial level.

Analysis within both individual and group settings is set forth clearly, but is too brief.

Analysis within both individual and group settings is set forth clearly and distinctly. Description is perceptive and detailed.

10.0 %Synthesis and Argument

No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.

Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.

25.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing

Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Format

5.0 %APA Format

Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.

100 %Total Weightage

Bottom of Form

Attachments:

Top of Form Apply Rubrics 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% 3 Satisfactory…

TALK TO SUPPORT VIA LIVE CHAT TO SEE THIS ANSWER AT $ 10 ONLY