Critical Response Papers Dos and Don’ts: A critical response paper should be fairly formal and…

Critical Response Papers Dos and Don’ts: A critical response paper should be fairly formal and…

CriticalResponse Papers Dos and Don’ts:

A critical response paper should be fairly formal and should genuinely attempt to shed light on one or more aspects of the literature you have read. You may discuss the significance of the reading which should include:two important facts and why; two key conclusions and how they were reached; and key implications or insights. Overall, I am looking for interesting and original insights concerning the reading.

An ideal response will be about a 3-5 pages in length and typed. Your paper will explore a problem or point of interest created by a work of literature (this includes, but is not limited to, thematic elements, symbol, irony, etc.). Your ideas and insights will be based on information from the pages in the text we have read so far, calling upon specific examples to illustrate the idea or issue you are exploring. Your grade will be based on the quality and depth of your insights, and on the use of specific textual evidence as support. (Avoid the obvious! Take risks! Make it interesting!)

Due March 05, 2017

Question:Please explain the differences and similarities betweenQuijano/Wallerstein, Oliver C. Cox, Tanya MariaGolash-Boza in their discussion about the origins of ethnicity and race? Please explain what kinds of implications are there in their arguments that might have reinforced or changed your understanding of ethnic and racial identity?

Critical Response Papers Dos and Don’ts: A critical response paper should be fairly formal and…

TALK TO SUPPORT VIA LIVE CHAT TO SEE THIS ANSWER AT $ 10 ONLY